### December 22 nd , 2004

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 53C20, 53C24, 53C30, 53C42, 53C40.supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant PBFR-106367.
<ph f="cmbx">Almost extrinsically homogeneous submanifolds of Euclidean space</ph>

### Peter Quast

Departement de mathematiques, Universite de Fribourg, Switzerland E-mail address : peter.quast@unifr.ch Current address : Institut für Mathematik, Universität Augsburg, Deutschland E-mail address : peter.quast@math.uni-augsburg.de

• Abstract. Consider a closed manifold $M$  immersed in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  Suppose that the trivial bundle $M×{\mathbb{R}}^{m}=TM\otimes \nu M$  is equipped with an almost metric connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  which almost preserves the decomposition of $M×{\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  into the tangent and the normal bundle.
Assume moreover that the difference $\Gamma =\partial -\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  with the usual derivative $\partial$  in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  is almost $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel. Then $M$  admits an extrinsically homogeneous immersion into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$

Introduction

In Riemannian geometry special geometric structures are often locally characterized by the parallelism of certain tensors. In his thesis, Nomizu [8showed that a Riemannian manifold $\left(M,{g}_{M}\right)$  is locally homogeneous, if and only if it admits a metric connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla },$  called canonical connection, such that its torsion, its curvature tensor and the tensor $\Gamma =\nabla -\stackrel{~}{\nabla },$  where $\nabla$  denotes the Riemannian connection on $M,$  are $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel.
Even before it was observed by É. Cartan that a Riemannian manifold is locally symmetric, if and only if the Riemannian connection is canonical in this sense.
A technique due to Strübing [13shows that in the case of complete submanifolds, the parallelism of a certain structure often implies extrinsic geometric properties, which are even global. An analogy to Nomizu's theorem was given by Olmos [10and (in a more general situation) by Eschenburg [3. Extrinsic homogeneity of closed submanifolds in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  is equivalent to the existence of a metric connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  on the trivial bundle $M×{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\sim =TM\oplus \nu M,$  such that $TM$  and $\nu M$  are $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel subbundles and such that the difference tensor $\Gamma =\partial -\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  with the usual derivative $\partial$  in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  is $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel. If the normal part of $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  coincides with the usual normal connection, then, according to Olmos and Sánchez [9, $M$  is essentially an orbit of an $s$  -representation and vice-versa. If moreover the tangent part of the canonical connection is just the Riemannian connection, then $M$  is extrinsically symmetric in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  This analogy to É Cartan's characterization of locally symmetric spaces is due to Ferus [4.
Katsuda [5showed a pinched version of Nomizu's theorem. Another pinching result in the case of compact symmetric spaces was provided by Min-Oo and Ruh [7. In this paper we show a pinching theorem for extrinsically homogeneous submanifolds of Euclidean space, obtained from the characterization of Olmos and Eschenburg. The technique we use is somehow similar to the one used by Katsuda. We further discuss in detail the case of orbits of $s$  -representations and the case of extrinsically symmetric submanifolds. In the last case the result was shown by the author and can be found in [11.

1 Preliminaries

A real valued function $f$  defined on a bounded domain $\Omega$  of some Euclidean space is said to be of class ${\mathcal{C}}^{k,\alpha },k\in \mathbb{N},\alpha \in \left[0,1\right],$  if it is bounded in the ${\mathcal{C}}^{k,\alpha }$  Hölder-norm: $||f|{|}_{k,\alpha }={\sum }_{0\le |\beta |\le k}{sup}_{x\in \Omega }|{\partial }_{\beta }f\left(x\right)|+{\sum }_{|\beta |=k}{sup}_{x\ne y}\frac{|{\partial }_{\beta }f\left(x\right)-{\partial }_{\beta }f\left(y\right)|}{|x-y{|}^{\alpha }}.$  A tensor on a compact manifold $M$  resp. a mapping between two manifolds is said to be of class ${\mathcal{C}}^{k,\alpha },$  if there are local coordinates such that in these coordinates its components are of class ${\mathcal{C}}^{k,\alpha }.$  For a compact manifold $M$  we denote by ${\mathcal{C}}^{k,\alpha }\left(M,{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)$  the Hölder space of ${\mathcal{C}}^{k,\alpha }$  functions form $M$  to ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  We have the following embedding theorem for Hölder spaces:
Proposition 1. Let $M$  be a compact manifold, ${k}_{1},{k}_{2}$  be two positive integers and $0\le {\alpha }_{1},{\alpha }_{2}\le 1$  such that ${k}_{1}+{\alpha }_{1}>{k}_{2}+{\alpha }_{2}.$  Then the canonical embedding ${\mathcal{C}}^{{k}_{1},{\alpha }_{1}}\left(M,{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)⟶{\mathcal{C}}^{{k}_{2},{\alpha }_{2}}\left(M,{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)$  is compact, i.e. any bounded sequence in ${\mathcal{C}}^{{k}_{1},{\alpha }_{1}}\left(M,{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)$  has a convergent subsequence in ${\mathcal{C}}^{{k}_{2},{\alpha }_{2}}\left(M,{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right).$
By $\mathcal{ℳ}\left(\Lambda ,d,v,n\right)$  we denote the class of $n$  -dimensional compact Riemannian manifolds $M$  with bounded sectional curvature $|K|\le {\Lambda }^{2}$  and diameter $diam\left(M\right)\le d$  and admitting moreover a lower bound on the volume ( $vol\left(M\right)\ge v\right).$  M. Gromov, A. Katsuda, S. Peters and R. Greene and H. Wu (see [12,Appendix) provided the following convergence result for sequences in $\mathcal{ℳ}\left(\Lambda ,d,v,n\right):$
Theorem 2. Let $\left({M}_{i},{g}_{i}{\right)}_{i\in \mathbb{N}}$  be a sequence in $\mathcal{ℳ}\left(\Lambda ,d,v,n\right)$  and let ${\alpha }^{\prime }\in \right]0,1\left[$  be fixed. Then there exists a subsequence $\left({M}_{{i}_{j}},{g}_{{i}_{j}}{\right)}_{j\in \mathbb{N}}$  and a smooth manifold $M$  equipped with a Riemannian metric $g$  of class ${\mathcal{C}}^{1,{\alpha }^{\prime }}$  such that the following holds: There is an integer ${j}_{0}$  such that for all $j\ge {j}_{0}$  there are ${\mathcal{C}}^{\infty }-$  diffeomorphisms ${f}_{{i}_{j}}:M⟶{M}_{{i}_{j}}$  such that the sequence of pullback metrics $\left({f}_{{i}_{j}}^{*}{g}_{{i}_{j}}{\right)}_{j\in \mathbb{N}}$  on $M$  converge to $g$  in the ${\mathcal{C}}^{1,\alpha }$  topology $\left(0<\alpha <{\alpha }^{\prime }\right).$
Let $|\cdot |$  be a norm on ${\mathbb{R}}^{n}$  and let $||\cdot |{|}_{l}$  be a norm on $Hom\left({\mathbb{R}}^{n},{\mathbb{R}}^{n}\right)$  satisfying $|Ax|\le ||A|{|}_{l}\cdot |x|,$  where $A\in Hom\left({\mathbb{R}}^{n},{\mathbb{R}}^{n}\right)$  and $x\in {\mathbb{R}}^{n};$  e.g. the operator norm on linear endomorphisms. Then $\left(Hom\left({\mathbb{R}}^{n},{\mathbb{R}}^{n}\right),||\cdot |{|}_{l}\right)$  is a Banach space. For further use, we state the following Gronwall-type inequality:
Lemma 3. Let $f,b:\left[0,T\right]⟶{\mathbb{R}}^{n}$  and $A:\left[0,T\right]⟶Hom\left({\mathbb{R}}^{n},{\mathbb{R}}^{n}\right)$  be smooth functions. Assume that the functions $A\left(t\right)$  and $b\left(t\right)$  are bounded on $\left[0,T\right],$  i.e. $||A\left(t\right)|{|}_{l}\le {A}_{0}$  and $|b\left(t\right)|\le {b}_{0}.$  If ${f}^{\prime }\left(t\right)=A\left(t\right)f\left(t\right)+b\left(t\right),$  then $|f\left(t\right)|\le |f\left(0\right)|{e}^{{A}_{0}t}+\frac{{b}_{0}}{{A}_{0}}\left({e}^{{A}_{0}t}-1\right).$

2 Extrinsically homogeneous submanifolds

Consider a closed (i.e. compact and connected) $n$  -dimensional Riemannian manifold $\left({M}^{n},g\right)$  and an isometric immersion $f:\left(M,{g}_{M}\right)⟶\left({\mathbb{R}}^{m},{g}_{can}\right)$  of $M$  into the $m$  -dimensional Euclidean space with its canonical metric.
The immersion $f$  induces a splitting of the trivial bundle $\mathcal{ℰ}={f}^{*}T{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\sim =T{\mathbb{R}}^{m}{|}_{f\left(M\right)}\sim =M×{\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  over $M$  as a direct sum of the tangent bundle $TM$  and the normal bundle $\nu M,$  i.e. $\mathcal{ℰ}=TM\oplus \nu M.$  The bundle metric $g$  on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  induced by ${g}_{can}$  splits accordingly $g={g}^{T}\oplus {g}^{\perp },$  where ${g}^{T}\sim ={g}_{M}.$  Since our considerations are of local nature, we identify always locally vector fields on $M$  with the corresponding vector fields on $f\left(M\right).$  In the following, vectors tangent to $M$  will be denoted by capital Roman letters and normal vectors by Greek ones. If $X$  is an element of $\mathcal{ℰ},$  we denote by ${X}^{T}$  its tangent and by ${X}^{\perp }$  its normal component. Let $\partial$  denote the canonical derivative in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  and $\nabla$  the Riemannian connection on $M.$  The normal bundle $\nu M$  is equipped with a metric connection ${\nabla }^{\perp }$  defined by ${\nabla }_{X}^{\perp }\xi =\left({\partial }_{X}\xi {\right)}^{\perp }.$  The second fundamental form $\alpha$  of $f$  is defined by $\alpha \left(X,Y\right)={\partial }_{X}Y-{\nabla }_{X}Y$  and the corresponding shape operator $A$  by ${A}_{\xi }X={\nabla }_{X}^{\perp }\xi -{\partial }_{X}\xi .$  Since $\partial$  is metric, the second fundamental form and the shape operator are related by $g\left({A}_{\xi }X,Y\right)={g}^{\perp }\left(\alpha \left(X,Y\right),\xi \right).$  Moreover, $R$  denotes the Riemannian curvature tensor, $K$  the sectional curvature and $inj\left(M\right)$  the injectivity radius of $M.$  The submanifold $f\left(M\right)$  is called extrinsically homogeneous, if for any pair of points $p,q$  in $f\left(M\right),$  there exists an isometry of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  mapping $p$  to $q$  while leaving $f\left(M\right)$  invariant. Hence extrinsically homogeneous submanifolds of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  are orbits of subgroups of the isometry group of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  A connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  is called (extrinsic) canonical connection (w.r.t. $f$  ) if
• (i) $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  is metric;
• (ii) $TM$  is a $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel subbundle of $\mathcal{ℰ};$
• (iii) The difference tensor $\Gamma =\partial -\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  is $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel.
By the second property the connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  splits as $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }={\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}\oplus {\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{\perp }$  in a connection ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  on the tangent bundle and a connection ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{\perp }$  on the normal bundle, both of which are metric. Moreover the second fundamental form and the shape operator are $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel (cf. [1,p. 204).
Since $M$  is closed, $f\left(M\right)$  cannot be totally geodesic in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  Thus the second fundamental form $\alpha$  does not vanish. Hence the connection on $\mathcal{ℬ}$  induced by $\partial$  does not preserve $TM$  and $\nu M$  and is therefore not canonical.
As an analogy to Nomizu's characterization [8of abstract Riemannian homogeneous spaces, a result due to Olmos [10and Eschenburg [3characterizes the extrinsically homogeneous submanifolds of Euclidean space:
Theorem 4 ([10, [3). A closed submanifold of Euclidean space is extrinsically homogeneous, if and only if it admits a canonical connection.

3 Almost canonical connections

Let $\left({M}^{n},{g}_{M}\right)$  be a compact connected $n$  -dimensional Riemannian manifold and let $f:\left(M,{g}_{M}\right)⟶\left({\mathbb{R}}^{m},{g}_{can}\right)$  be an isometric immersion. We denote by $||T|{|}_{0}$  the supremum of the norm of the tensor $T$  with unit vectors as arguments.
Given a connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  on $\mathcal{ℰ},$  we define a tensor $\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\in T{M}^{*}\otimes T{M}^{*}\otimes \nu M$  by $\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left(X,Y\right)=\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}Y{\right)}^{\perp }$  and a tensor $\stackrel{~}{A}\in \nu {M}^{*}\otimes T{M}^{*}\otimes TM$  by $\stackrel{~}{A}\left(\xi ,X\right)={\stackrel{~}{A}}_{\xi }X=-\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}\xi {\right)}^{T}.$  Again $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  induces a tangent connection ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  on $M$  defined by ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}^{T}Y=\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}Y{\right)}^{T}={\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}Y-\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left(X,Y\right)$  and a normal connection ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{\perp }$  defined by ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}^{\perp }\xi =\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}\xi {\right)}^{\perp },$  where $X$  and $Y$  are tangent vector fields and $\xi$  is a normal vector field on $M.$  Let $\varepsilon >0.$  A connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  is said to be an $\varepsilon$  -almost canonical connection (w.r.t. $f$  ) if
• (i) $||\stackrel{~}{\nabla }g|{|}_{0}<\varepsilon ;$
• (ii) $||\stackrel{~}{\alpha }|{|}_{0}<\varepsilon ,$  i.e. $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  almost preserves $TM;$
• (iii) $||\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\Gamma |{|}_{0}<\varepsilon ,$  where $\Gamma =\partial -\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\in T{M}^{*}\otimes {\mathcal{ℰ}}^{*}\otimes \mathcal{ℬ}$  and $\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}\Gamma \right)\left(Y,Z\right)={\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}\left(\Gamma \left(Y,Z\right)\right)-\Gamma \left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}^{T}Y,Z\right)-\Gamma \left(Y,{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}Z\right)$  for tangent vector fields $X,Y$  and and a section $Z$  in $\mathcal{ℬ}.$
Notice that
 $\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{ccc}||\stackrel{~}{\nabla }g|{|}_{0}& =& ||\stackrel{~}{\nabla }g-\partial g|{|}_{0}=||\Gamma g|{|}_{0}\\ & =& sup\left\{|g\left({\Gamma }_{X}Y,Z\right)+g\left(Y,{\Gamma }_{X}Z\right)|;\\ & & X\in TM,Y,Z\in \mathcal{ℰ},|X|=|Y|=|Z|=1\right\}.\end{array}\end{array}$ (1)
It is sometimes advantageous to consider $\stackrel{~}{\alpha }$  and $\stackrel{~}{A}$  as elements of $Hom\left(\mathcal{ℰ}\otimes \mathcal{ℰ},\mathcal{ℰ}\right)$  as follows:
 $\begin{array}{ccc}\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left(X,Y\right)& =& \stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({X}^{T},{Y}^{T}\right),\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}{\stackrel{~}{A}}_{X}Y& =& {\stackrel{~}{A}}_{{X}^{\perp }}{Y}^{T};X,Y\in \mathcal{ℬ}.\end{array}$
From now on we always assume that $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  is an $\varepsilon$  -almost canonical connection.
Take to two tangent vector fields $X,Y$  and a normal vector field $\xi .$  Since $g\left(Y,\xi \right)=0,$  we get $0=Xg\left(Y,\xi \right)=\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}g\right)\left(Y,\xi \right)-g\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}Y,\xi \right)-g\left(Y,{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}\xi \right).$  Thus $\stackrel{~}{\alpha }$  and $\stackrel{~}{A}$  are related by $g\left(\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left(X,Y\right),\xi \right)=g\left(Y,{\stackrel{~}{A}}_{\xi }X\right)+\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}g\right)\left(Y,\xi \right).$  If $Y={\stackrel{~}{A}}_{\xi }X,$  we get $|{\stackrel{~}{A}}_{\xi }X|=g\left(\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left(X,{\stackrel{~}{A}}_{\xi }X\right),\xi \right)-\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}g\right)\left({\stackrel{~}{A}}_{\xi }X,\xi \right).$  Hence the following lemma is immediate:
Lemma 5. $||\stackrel{~}{A}|{|}_{0}<2\varepsilon ,$  i.e. $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  almost preserves $\nu M.$
Although the connection ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  might not be geodesically complete, we get an estimate for the speed of ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -geodesics on $M$  at least for times smaller than a certain value.
Lemma 6. Let $\gamma :\left[0,T\right]⟶M$  be a ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -geodesic, i.e. ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}^{T}{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)=0,$  then for $0\le t<\frac{2}{3\varepsilon |{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(0\right)|}$  we have $\frac{2|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(0\right)|}{2+3\varepsilon t|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(0\right)|}\le |{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)|\le \frac{2|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(0\right)|}{2-3\varepsilon t|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(0\right)|}.$
• Proof. Since  $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right){|}^{2}& =& 2\cdot |{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)|\cdot \frac{d}{dt}|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)|=\frac{d}{dt}g\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& 2g\left({\partial }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& \left({\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}g\right)\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)\right)+2g\left(\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)\right),{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)\right),\end{array}$
we get by Formula ( 1 ):
$-\frac{3}{2}\varepsilon \le \frac{\frac{d}{dt}|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)|}{|{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right){|}^{2}}\le \frac{3}{2}\varepsilon .$  Integration now yields the claim.

4 Parallel displacement and almost isometries

Let $M$  be a closed submanifold of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  Assume that the trivial bundle $\mathcal{ℰ}=M×{\mathbb{R}}^{m}=T{\mathbb{R}}^{m}{|}_{M}=TM\oplus \nu M$  is equipped with an $\varepsilon$  -almost canonical connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }.$  Let $p$  and $q$  be two points on $M$  and let $c:\left[0,L\right]\to M$  be a curve joining $p$  and $q.$  Let $P:{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\sim ={\mathcal{ℰ}}_{p}⟶{\mathcal{ℰ}}_{q}\sim ={\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  denote the linear map given by the $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel translation along $c$  and let $C=sup\left\{|{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)|;t\in \left[0,L\right]\right\}.$

Notation.

In this section we have to deal with quite a lot of estimates. In order to make these estimates easier and the proofs more readable, we introduce the following notation: By $k$  or ${k}_{i},i\in \mathbb{N}$  we denote non-vanishing constants depending on $\varepsilon$  which converge to a non-vanishing constant if $\varepsilon$  tends to $0.$  The exacte value of $k$  and ${k}_{i}$  might change from formula to formula.
Lemma 7. If $X$  and $Y$  are unit vectors in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m},$  then $|〈P\left(X\right),P\left(Y\right)〉-〈X,Y〉|\le \varepsilon \cdot k.$
• Proof. Let $X$  and $Y$  be two unit vectors in ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}\sim ={\mathcal{ℰ}}_{p}$  and let $X\left(t\right)$  and $Y\left(t\right)$  be the vector fields along $c\left(t\right)$  obtained by the $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel translations of $X$  and $Y.$  Then $P\left(X\right)=X\left(L\right)$  and $P\left(Y\right)=Y\left(L\right).$  Further  $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}〈X\left(t\right),Y\left(t\right)〉& =& \left(〈{\Gamma }_{{\overline{c}}^{\prime }}\overline{X}\left(t\right),\overline{Y}\left(t\right)〉+〈\overline{X}\left(t\right),{\Gamma }_{{\overline{c}}^{\prime }}\overline{Y}\left(t\right)〉\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& & \cdot |X\left(t\right)|\cdot |Y\left(t\right)|\cdot |{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)|\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& \le & |X\left(t\right)|\cdot |Y\left(t\right)|\cdot C\cdot \varepsilon ,\end{array}$
where ${\overline{c}}^{\prime }=\frac{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}{|{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)|},\overline{X}\left(t\right)=\frac{X\left(t\right)}{|X\left(t\right)|}$  and $\overline{Y}\left(t\right)=\frac{Y\left(t\right)}{|Y\left(t\right)|}.$  As in the proof of Lemma  6 we get $\frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right){|}^{2}=2\cdot |X\left(t\right)|\cdot \frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right)|=\frac{d}{dt}〈X\left(t\right),X\left(t\right)〉\le \varepsilon \cdot C\cdot |X\left(t\right){|}^{2}.$  Thus $\frac{\frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right)|}{|X\left(t\right)|}\le \frac{1}{2}\cdot \varepsilon \cdot C.$  Integration yields $|X\left(t\right)|\le {e}^{\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon Ct}.$  Thus $\frac{d}{dt}〈X\left(t\right),Y\left(t\right)〉\le \varepsilon \cdot C\cdot {e}^{\varepsilon CL}.$  A second integration shows the statement.
Corollary 8. $||P|{|}_{0}\le \sqrt{\varepsilon \cdot k+1}.$
Lemma 9. Let $X$  be a an element of ${\mathcal{ℰ}}_{p}$  and let $X\left(t\right)$  denote the $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel vector field along $c.$  Then $|X\left(t\right)|\le {e}^{\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon CL}\cdot |{X}^{T}\left(0\right)|.$
• Proof. Analogously to the proof of Lemma  6 we get  $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right){|}^{2}=& 2\cdot |X\left(t\right)|\cdot \frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right)|& =\frac{d}{dt}g\left(X\left(t\right),X\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}=& 2g\left({\partial }_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}X\left(t\right),X\left(t\right)\right)& =\left({\Gamma }_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}g\right)\left(X\left(t\right),X\left(t\right)\right).\end{array}$
By Formula ( 1 ) we now obtain:
$\frac{\frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right)|}{|X\left(t\right)|}\le \frac{1}{2}\cdot \varepsilon \cdot C.$  Integration now yields again the claim.
Lemma 10. Let $X$  be a an element of ${T}_{p}M$  and let $X\left(t\right)$  and ${X}^{T}\left(t\right)$  denote the corresponding $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel and ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -parallel vector fields along $c.$  Then $|{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\le {e}^{\frac{3}{2}\varepsilon CL}\cdot |{X}^{T}\left(0\right)|$  and $|X\left(t\right)-{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\le \varepsilon \cdot t\cdot k.$
• Proof. The proofs of these inequalities are similar to the proof of Lemma  9 . In the first case we observe that  $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}|{X}^{T}\left(t\right){|}^{2}& =& 2\cdot |{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\cdot \frac{d}{dt}|{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& \frac{d}{dt}g\left({X}^{T}\left(t\right),{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right)=2\cdot g\left({\partial }_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}{X}^{T}\left(t\right),{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& \left({\Gamma }_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}g\right)\left({X}^{T}\left(t\right),{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right)+2\cdot g\left(\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({c}^{\prime }\left(t\right),{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right),{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right).\end{array}$
In the second case we get  $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right)-{X}^{T}\left(t\right){|}^{2}& =& \left({\Gamma }_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}g\right)\left(X\left(t\right)-{X}^{T}\left(t\right),X\left(t\right)-{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& & +2\cdot g\left(\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({c}^{\prime }\left(t\right),{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right),X\left(t\right)-{X}^{T}\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
and therefore  $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}|X\left(t\right)-{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|& \le & \frac{1}{2}\cdot \varepsilon \cdot C\cdot \left(|X\left(t\right)-{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|+2|{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& \le & \frac{1}{2}\cdot \varepsilon \cdot C\cdot \left(|X\left(t\right)|+3|{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\right)=\varepsilon \cdot k.\end{array}$
Since $X\left(0\right)={X}^{T}\left(0\right)=X,$  the Lemma follows now by integration.
By $\overline{g}$  we donte the unique affine transformation of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  satisfying $\overline{g}\left(p\right)=q$  and ${\overline{g}}_{*}{|}_{p}=P.$
Lemma 11. Let ${X}^{T}\left(t\right)$  be a ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -parallel vector field in $TM$  along $c,$  then $||{\overline{g}}_{*}\circ {\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(0\right)}\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}-{\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(L\right)}|{|}_{0}<\varepsilon \cdot k.$
• Proof. Let $Y$  be a unit vector in ${\mathcal{ℰ}}_{q}$  and let $Y\left(t\right)$  be the $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel vector field along $c$  given by $Y\left(L\right)=Y.$  By $A\left(t\right)$  we denote the $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel vector field along $c$  with $A\left(0\right)={\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(0\right)}Y\left(0\right).$  Then $A\left(L\right)=\left({\overline{g}}_{*}\circ {\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(0\right)}\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}\right)Y.$  Since ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\left({\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(t\right)}Y\left(t\right)\right)={\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\Gamma \right)}_{{X}^{T}\left(t\right)}Y\left(t\right),$  we get for $Z\left(t\right)=A\left(t\right)-{\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(t\right)}Y\left(t\right):$   $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}|Z\left(t\right){|}^{2}& =& 2\cdot |Z\left(t\right)|\cdot \frac{d}{dt}|Z\left(t\right)|=\frac{d}{dt}g\left(Z\left(t\right),Z\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& \left({\Gamma }_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}g\right)\left(Z\left(t\right),Z\left(t\right)\right)+2g\left(\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{{c}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\Gamma {\right)}_{{X}^{T}\left(t\right)}Y\left(t\right),Z\left(t\right)\right).\end{array}$
Hence with the estimates of Lemma  9 and  10 we obtain  $\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{d}{dt}|A\left(t\right)-{\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(t\right)}Y\left(t\right)|& \le & \varepsilon \cdot C\left(|A\left(t\right)-{\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(t\right)}Y\left(t\right)|+2|{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\cdot |Y\left(t\right)|\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& \le & \varepsilon \cdot C\left(|A\left(t\right)|+\left(||\Gamma |{|}_{0}+2\right)\cdot |{X}^{T}\left(t\right)|\cdot |Y\left(t\right)|\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& \le & \varepsilon \cdot \kappa .\end{array}$
As $A\left(0\right)={\Gamma }_{{X}^{T}\left(0\right)}Y\left(0\right)$  this lemma follows by integration.
Proposition 12. Assume1 that the canonical connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  does not coincide with the connection on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  induced by $\partial .$  Let $X\in {T}_{p}M$  be a unit vector and let $\gamma$  be the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -geodesic on $M$  with ${\gamma }^{\prime }\left(0\right)=X.$  Consider further the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -geodesic $\stackrel{~}{\gamma }\left(t\right)$  on $M$  defined by ${\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(0\right)={X}^{T}\left(L\right),$  where ${X}^{T}\left(t\right)$  is the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -parallel vector field along $c$  with ${X}^{T}\left(0\right)=X.$  Then for $0\le t\le T<\frac{2}{3\varepsilon \sqrt{\varepsilon CL{e}^{\varepsilon CL}+1}}$  we obtain $|\left(\overline{g}\circ \gamma \right)\left(t\right)-\stackrel{~}{\gamma }\left(t\right)|<\varepsilon \cdot {h}_{\varepsilon }\left(t\right)$  with a function ${h}_{\varepsilon }$  which does not diverge if $\varepsilon$  tends to $0.$
• Proof. Recall that $k$  and ${k}_{i},i\in \mathbb{N}$  denote non-vanishing constants depending on $\varepsilon$  which converge to a non-vanishing constant if $\varepsilon$  tends to $0.$  Their exacte values might change from formula to formula.
Let $E\left(t\right)={\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)$  be the tangent vector field of $\gamma .$  Then ${E}^{\prime }\left(t\right)={\partial }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}E\left(t\right)={\partial }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}E\left(t\right)-{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}^{T}E\left(t\right)={\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}E\left(t\right)+\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),E\left(t\right)\right).$  Let $F$  be the tangent vector field of the curve $\overline{g}\circ \gamma ,$  i.e. $F\left(t\right)={\overline{g}}_{*}E\left(t\right).$  Since $\overline{g}$  is an affine map we obtain  $\begin{array}{ccc}{F}^{\prime }\left(t\right)& =& {\partial }_{\left(\overline{g}\circ \gamma {\right)}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}F\left(t\right)={\partial }_{{\overline{g}}_{*}\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)\right)}{\overline{g}}_{*}E\left(t\right)={\overline{g}}_{*}\left({\partial }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}E\left(t\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& {\overline{g}}_{*}\left({\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}E\left(t\right)+\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),E\left(t\right)\right)\right)\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& \left({\overline{g}}_{*}\circ \left({\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}+\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),\cdot \right)\right)\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}\right)F\left(t\right).\end{array}$
Thus we get the following ordinary differential equation:
$\left(F\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}\left(\overline{g}\circ \gamma {\right)}^{\prime }\left(t\right)=F\left(t\right);\\ {F}^{\prime }\left(t\right)=\left({\overline{g}}_{*}\circ \left({\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}+\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),\cdot \right)\right)\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}\right)F\left(t\right);\\ initialconditions\left(\overline{g}\circ \gamma \right)\left(0\right)=q,F\left(0\right)={\overline{g}}_{*}X.\end{array}$  Consider now the tangent vector field $G$  of the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -geodesic $\stackrel{~}{\gamma }.$  Since $G$  is ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -parallel, we have:
$\left(G\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)=G\left(t\right);\\ {G}^{\prime }\left(t\right)={\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}G\left(t\right)+\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right),G\left(t\right)\right);\\ initialconditions\stackrel{~}{\gamma }\left(0\right)=q,G\left(0\right)={X}^{T}\left(L\right).\end{array}$  The difference of $\left(F\right)$  and $G$  gives rise to the following differential equation $\left(H\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}\left(\overline{g}\circ \gamma -\stackrel{~}{\gamma }{\right)}^{\prime }\left(t\right)=F\left(t\right)-G\left(t\right);\\ {F}^{\prime }\left(t\right)-{G}^{\prime }\left(t\right)={\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\left(F\left(t\right)-G\left(t\right)\right)+Z\left(t\right);\\ initialconditions\left(\overline{g}\circ \gamma -\stackrel{~}{\gamma }\right)\left(0\right)=0\\ andF\left(0\right)-G\left(0\right)={\overline{g}}_{*}X-{X}^{T}\left(L\right),\end{array}$  where $Z\left(t\right)=\Delta \left(t\right)F\left(t\right)+{\overline{g}}_{*}\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),{\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}F\left(t\right)\right)-\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right),G\left(t\right)\right)$  and $\Delta \left(t\right)={\overline{g}}_{*}\circ {\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}-{\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}.$  By Lemma  6 we get  $\begin{array}{c}||{\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}|{|}_{0}\le \frac{2}{2-3\varepsilon T}||\Gamma |{|}_{0}.\end{array}$ (2)
Let $X$  be a $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel section in $\mathcal{ℰ},$  then $\left(\frac{d}{dt}{\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\right)X\left(t\right)={\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}{\partial }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}X=\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\Gamma {\right)}_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}X$  and hence ${||\frac{d}{dt}{\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}||}_{0}\le |{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right){|}^{2}\cdot ||\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\Gamma |{|}_{0}.$  Using again Lemma  6 yields:  $\begin{array}{c}{||\frac{d}{dt}{\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right)}||}_{0}\le \varepsilon \cdot k.\end{array}$ (3)
Observe that ${\overline{g}}^{-1}$  is obtained by parallel translation along $c$  in the reverse direction, hence the estimate of Corollary  8 also holds for ${\overline{g}}^{-1}.$  Together with ${||\frac{d}{dt}\left({\overline{g}}_{*}\circ {\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}\right)||}_{0}\le {||{\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}||}_{0}\cdot {||\frac{d}{dt}{\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}||}_{0}\cdot {||{\overline{g}}_{*}||}_{0}$  we get  $\begin{array}{c}{||\frac{d}{dt}\left({\overline{g}}_{*}\circ {\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right)}\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}\right)||}_{0}\le \varepsilon \cdot k.\end{array}$ (4)
Since $\Delta \left(t\right)={\int }_{0}^{t}{\Delta }^{\prime }\left(s\right)ds+||\Delta \left(0\right)|{|}_{0},$  the estimates ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) together with Lemma  11 provide the following estimate of $||\Delta \left(t\right)|{|}_{0}:$   $\begin{array}{ccc}||\Delta \left(t\right)|{|}_{0}& \le & {\int }_{0}^{t}{||\frac{d}{ds}\Delta \left(s\right)||}_{0}ds+||\Delta \left(0\right)|{|}_{0}\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& =& {\int }_{0}^{t}\left({||\frac{d}{ds}{\Gamma }_{{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(s\right)}||}_{0}+{||\frac{d}{ds}\left({\overline{g}}_{*}\circ {\Gamma }_{{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(s\right)}\circ {\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}\right)||}_{0}\right)ds\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& & +||\Delta \left(0\right)|{|}_{0}\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& \le & \varepsilon \cdot k.\end{array}$
Moreover by Lemma  6 and Corollary  8 we get $|F\left(t\right)|=|{\overline{g}}_{*}E\left(t\right)|\le ||{\overline{g}}_{*}|{|}_{0}\cdot |E\left(t\right)|\le k$  and hence $|\Delta \left(t\right)F\left(t\right)|\le \varepsilon \cdot k.$  Since $|{\overline{g}}_{*}\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),{\overline{g}}_{*}^{-1}F\left(t\right)\right)|=|{\overline{g}}_{*}\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right),E\left(t\right)\right)|\le ||{\overline{g}}_{*}|{|}_{0}\cdot ||\stackrel{~}{\alpha }|{|}_{0}\cdot |{\gamma }^{\prime }\left(t\right){|}^{2}\le \varepsilon \cdot k$  and $|\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left({\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right),G\left(t\right)\right)|\le ||\stackrel{~}{\alpha }|{|}_{0}\cdot |{\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(t\right){|}^{2}\le \varepsilon \cdot k,$  we obtain the estimate:
$|Z\left(t\right)|\le \varepsilon \cdot k.$  Applying to $\left(H\right)$  the Gronwall-type inequality of Lemma  3 together with Lemma  10 yields:
$|F\left(t\right)-G\left(t\right)|\le \varepsilon \cdot \left({k}_{1}\cdot {e}^{k\cdot t}+{k}_{2}\cdot \left({e}^{k\cdot t}-1\right)\right),$  where ${k}_{2}=\frac{2}{2-3\varepsilon T}||\Gamma |{|}_{0}.$  Since $||\Gamma |{|}_{0}\ne 0,$  integration shows the claim:
 $\begin{array}{ccc}|\left(\overline{g}\circ \gamma -\stackrel{~}{\gamma }\right)\left(t\right)|& \le & {\int }_{0}^{t}|F\left(s\right)-G\left(s\right)|ds\end{array}$
 $\begin{array}{ccc}& \le & \varepsilon \cdot \left(\frac{{k}_{1}}{k}\cdot \left({e}^{kt}-1\right)+\frac{{k}_{2}}{k}\cdot \left({e}^{kt}-kt-1\right)\right).\end{array}$

Observation.

The conclusion of Proposition  12 holds also for broken geodesic lines $\gamma$  and the corresponding broken geodesic line $\stackrel{~}{\gamma }.$

5 The main result

Let $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,d,n,m,\varepsilon \right)$  be the set of all triples $\left({M}^{n},f,\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\right)$  consisting of a closed $n$  -dimensional manifold ${M}^{n},$  an immersion $f$  of $M$  into the $m$  -dimensional Euclidean space $\left({\mathbb{R}}^{m},{g}_{can}\right)$  and an $\varepsilon$  -almost canonical connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  w.r.t. $f$  satisfying:
• (1) The diameter of $M$  measured in the pullback metric ${f}^{*}{g}_{can}$  is bounded form above by $d;$
• (2) $||\alpha |{|}_{0}<\Lambda ;$
• (3) $||\Gamma |{|}_{0}<\Lambda .$
The first to conditions exclude collapsing and the last two bounds together with the definition of an $\varepsilon$  -canonical connection provide an estimate for $||\partial \Gamma |{|}_{0}$  in the following way: Let ${\Gamma }^{T}=\nabla -{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  and take two vectors $X$  and $Y$  in ${T}_{p}M.$  Then ${\Gamma }_{X}^{T}Y={\Gamma }_{X}Y-\alpha \left(X,Y\right)-\stackrel{~}{\alpha }\left(X,Y\right).$  Considering a vector $Z\in {\mathcal{ℰ}}_{p}$  we get $\left({\partial }_{X}\Gamma \right)\left(X,Y\right)=\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}\Gamma \right)\left(Y,Z\right)+{\Gamma }_{X}{\Gamma }_{Y}Z-{\Gamma }_{Y}{\Gamma }_{X}Z-{\Gamma }_{{\Gamma }_{X}^{T}Y}Z.$  Thus $||\partial \Gamma |{|}_{0}<\varepsilon \left(1+\Lambda \right)+2{\Lambda }^{2}\left(1+\varepsilon \right).$  Let $\left(M,f,\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\right)$  be an element of $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,d,n,m,\varepsilon \right),$  then $\left(M,{f}^{*}{g}_{can}\right)$  lies in $\mathcal{ℳ}\left(\Lambda \sqrt{2},d,\left(\Lambda \sqrt{2}{\right)}^{-n}vol\left({S}^{n},{g}_{0}\right),n\right),$  2 where $\left({S}^{n},{g}_{0}\right)$  denotes the standard unit sphere of dimension $n$  (see [11).
Proposition 13. Let $\Lambda ,d>0$  and let $M$  be a closed manifold of dimension $n.$  Assume that there exist a sequence $\left({f}_{i}\right)$  of immersions of $M$  into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  and a sequence $\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}\right)$  of connections on $\mathcal{ℬ}=M×{\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  If for each positive integer $i$  the triple $\left(M,{f}_{i},{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}\right)$  lies in $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,d,n,m,\frac{1}{i}\right),$  then there exists a subsequence of $\left({f}_{i}\right)$  converging to an extrinsically homogeneous immersion of $M$  into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$
• Proof. Multiplying $f$  by a constant, we can assume w.r.g. that $d=1.$  As we have to consider subsequences several times, we do not introduce a special notation in order to keep this proof readable.
Since $\left(M,{f}_{i}^{*}{g}_{can}\right)$  is a sequence in $\mathcal{ℳ}\left(\Lambda \sqrt{2},1,\left(\Lambda \sqrt{2}{\right)}^{-n}vol\left({S}^{n},{g}_{0}\right),n\right),$  we can assume by Theorem  2 that, after passing to a subsequence, there is a ${\mathcal{C}}^{1,{\alpha }^{\prime }}$  -Riemannian metric ${g}_{M}$  on $M$  such that the metrics ${{g}_{M}}_{i}:={f}_{i}^{*}{g}_{can}$  converge to ${g}_{M}$  in the ${\mathcal{C}}^{1,\alpha }$  -topology, $0<\alpha <{\alpha }^{\prime }<1.$  The diameter of $\left(M,{g}_{M}\right)$  is also bounded by $1.$  Let $||\cdot |{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}$  denote the supremum norm w.r.t. the metric ${{g}_{M}}_{i}.$  Now we fix a point ${p}_{0}$  on $M.$  By composition with an appropriate translation of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  we can assume that ${f}_{i}\left({p}_{0}\right)=0.$  Since the second fundamental form coincides with the Hessian of the immersion, the ${\mathcal{C}}^{2}$  -norm of ${f}_{i}$  on $\left(M,{{g}_{M}}_{i}\right)$  is given by $||{f}_{i}|{|}_{{\mathcal{C}}^{2}\left(\left(M,{{g}_{M}}_{i}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)}=||{f}_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}+||d{f}_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}+||{\alpha }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}.$  Notice that this norm is equivalent to the norm of Proposition  1 . Since $M$  is connected and ${f}_{i}\left({p}_{0}\right)=0,$  the maximum of ${f}_{i}$  is not greater than the diameter bound $d=1$  of $M.$  Thus we get $||{f}_{i}|{|}_{{\mathcal{C}}^{2}\left(\left(M,{{g}_{M}}_{i}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)}\le 2+\Lambda .$  The norms $||\cdot |{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}$  converge to $||\cdot |{|}_{0},$  the supremum norm corresponding $g.$  Hence the sequence $\left({f}_{i}\right)$  is bounded in ${\mathcal{C}}^{2}\left(\left(M,{g}_{M}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)$  as well for $i>{i}_{0}.$  By the embedding theorem for Hölder spaces (see Proposition  1 ) there exist a function $f\in {\mathcal{C}}^{1,\beta }\left(\left(M,{g}_{M}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right),0<\beta <1$  and a subsequence of $\left({f}_{i}\right)$  converging to $f$  in ${\mathcal{C}}^{1,\beta }\left(\left(M,{g}_{M}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right).$  From now on we restrict our attention to this subsequence $\left(M,{f}_{i},{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}\right)$  . Since ${f}_{i}$  converges to $f$  in the ${\mathcal{C}}^{1}$  -topology, $f$  is an isometric immersion of $\left(M,{g}_{M}\right)$  into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  Thus the metrics ${g}_{i}$  on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  induced by ${f}_{i}$  converge uniformly to the ${\mathcal{C}}^{0}$  metric $g$  on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  given by $f.$  Notice that ${{g}_{M}}_{i}$  and ${g}_{M}$  coincide with the tangent parts of ${g}_{i}$  and $g.$  By $||\cdot |{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}$  we denote the supremum norm w.r.t. ${g}_{i}.$  The supremum norm corresponding to $g$  is simply denoted by $||\cdot |{|}_{0}.$  Moreover the tangent and normal bundles of ${f}_{i},$  denoted by ${T}_{i}M$  and ${\nu }_{i}M$  converge as subbundles of $\mathcal{ℰ}$  to the tangent and normal bundle of $f,$  denoted by $TM$  and $\nu M,$  and the corresponding projections converge w.r.t. $||\cdot |{|}_{0}.$  By assumption $||{\Gamma }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}<\Lambda$  and $||\partial {\Gamma }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}<\frac{1+\Lambda }{i}+2{\Lambda }^{2}\left(1+\frac{1}{i}\right)<1+\Lambda +4{\Lambda }^{2}.$  Hence, since $||\cdot |{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}$  converges to $||\cdot |{|}_{0},$  the tensors ${\Gamma }_{i}$  and $\partial {\Gamma }_{i}$  admit for great $i$  a bound in the $||\cdot |{|}_{0}$  -norm not depending on $i.$  Thus for great $i$  the sequence $\left({\Gamma }_{i}\right)$  is ${\mathcal{C}}^{0}$  -bounded and equicontinous.
By the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem there exists a continuous tensor field $\Gamma$  on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  and a subsequence of $\left({\Gamma }_{i}\right)$  converging uniformly to $\Gamma .$  We observe that the connections ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}=\partial -{\Gamma }_{i}$  on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  converge to the continuous connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }:=\partial -\Gamma .$  We now prove that $f\left(M\right)$  is extrinsically homogeneous. Let $p$  and $q$  be two points on $M$  and let $c:\left[0,L\right]\to M$  be a curve joining $p$  and $q.$  Let ${\overline{g}}_{i}$  be the unique affine transformation of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  mapping ${f}_{i}\left(p\right)$  to ${f}_{i}\left(q\right)$  whose derivative ${P}_{i}$  at ${f}_{i}\left(p\right)$  coincides with the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}$  -parallel translation along $c.$  By Corollary  8  $||{P}_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}$  is bounded by $\sqrt{\frac{CL}{i}{e}^{\frac{CL}{i}}+1}\le \sqrt{CL{e}^{CL}+1}.$  Thus there exists a linear isometry $P$  of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  and a subsequence $\left({P}_{i}\right)$  converging uniformly to $P.$  Notice that $P$  coincides with the $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  -parallel translation along $c.$  3 Lemma  7 implies that the corresponding subsequence of affine maps $\left({\overline{g}}_{i}\right)$  converges to the isometry $\overline{g}$  of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  mapping $f\left(p\right)$  to $f\left(q\right)$  whose derivative at $f\left(p\right)$  is given by $P.$  Let $X$  be a unit tangent vector at $p$  w.r.t. ${g}_{M}$  and let ${X}_{i}$  be the unit vector w.r.t. ${{g}_{M}}_{i}$  obtained by rescaling $X.$  Let ${\gamma }_{i}$  denote the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}^{T}$  -geodesic defined by ${\gamma }_{i}^{\prime }\left(0\right)={X}_{i}$  and let ${\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}_{i}$  denote the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}^{T}$  -geodesic defined by ${\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}_{i}^{\prime }\left(0\right)={X}_{i}^{T}\left(L\right),$  where ${X}_{i}^{T}\left(t\right)$  is the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}^{T}$  -parallel tangent vector field along $c$  defined by ${X}_{i}.$  Since ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}^{T}$  and ${\overline{g}}_{i}$  converge uniformly to ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  and $\overline{g},$  the geodesics ${\gamma }_{i}$  and ${\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}_{i}$  converge pointwise to the ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}$  -geodesics $\gamma$  and $\stackrel{~}{\gamma }$  defined by ${\gamma }^{\prime }\left(0\right)=X$  and ${\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}^{\prime }\left(0\right)=X\left(L\right)={\overline{g}}_{*}X.$  Proposition  12 shows that $|\left(\overline{g}\circ f\circ \gamma \right)\left(t\right)-f\circ \stackrel{~}{\gamma }\left(t\right)|={lim}_{i\to \infty }|\left({\overline{g}}_{i}\circ {f}_{i}\circ {\gamma }_{i}\right)\left(t\right)-{f}_{i}\circ {\stackrel{~}{\gamma }}_{i}\left(t\right)|=0.$  Recall that Proposition  12 can easily be generalized to broken geodesic lines. Since by connectedness and compactness any two points of $M$  can be joint by a broken geodesic line, $\overline{g}$  leaves $f\left(M\right)$  invariant. Thus $f\left(M\right)$  is extrinsically homogeneous.
Although our proof guarantees a priori only that the limit immersion $f$  is of class ${\mathcal{C}}^{1,\beta },$  the image $f\left(M\right)$  is a smooth submanifold of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m},$  since $f\left(M\right)$  is extrinsically homogeneous.
Theorem 14. There exists a constant $\varepsilon >0$  depending on $\Lambda ,n,m$  and $d$  with the following property:
If a triple $\left(M,f,\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\right)$  lies in $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,d,n,m,\varepsilon \right),$  then $M$  can be immersed into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  as extrinsically homogeneous submanifold.
To avoid rescaling (blowing up), $\varepsilon$  depends on $d.$  To get rid of this dependance, one might replace the condition $||\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\Gamma |{|}_{0}<\varepsilon ,$  as stated in the definition of an $\varepsilon$  -almost canonical connection, by the rescaling invariant condition $||\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\Gamma |{|}_{0}\cdot {d}^{3}<\varepsilon .$
• Proof. W.r.g. let $d=1.$  Assume by contradiction that for each positive integer $i,$  there exists a triple $\left({M}_{i},{f}_{i},{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}\right)$  in $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,1,n,m,\frac{1}{i}\right)$  where ${M}_{i}$  does not admit an immersion into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  as extrinsically homogeneous submanifold. Since the sequence $\left({M}_{i},{f}_{i}^{*}{g}_{can}{\right)}_{i}$  is contained in $\mathcal{ℳ}\left(\Lambda \sqrt{2},1,\left(\Lambda \sqrt{2}{\right)}^{-n}vol\left({S}^{n},{g}_{0}\right),n\right),$  Theorem  2 implies that, after passing to a subsequence, there are a smooth manifold $M$  and diffeomorphisms ${h}_{i}:M\to {M}_{i}.$  Now we get a new sequence $\left(M,{f}_{i}\circ {h}_{i},{h}_{i}^{*}{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}\right)$  satisfying the assumptions of Proposition  13 . Thus $M$  admits an extrinsically homogeneous immersion into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m},$  a contradiction.
The following example shows that the condition $||\Gamma |{|}_{0}<\Lambda$  is necessary:
Consider the Grassmann manifold $G/K$  of all oriented $n$  -dimensional linear subspaces in ${\mathbb{R}}^{2n},$  where $G=O\left(2n\right)$  and $K=O\left(n\right)×O\left(n\right).$  The corresponding Cartan decomposition is denoted by $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus \mathfrak{p}.$  Let $M\sim =O\left(n\right)$  be the orbit of $\xi =\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& {I}_{n}\\ -{I}_{n}& 0\end{array}\right)\in \mathfrak{p}$  under the isotropy representation of $G/K.$  The isotropy group $H$  of $\xi$  is now the diagonal in $O\left(n\right)×O\left(n\right).$  As in the abstract case, an (extrinsic) canonical connection corresponds to a reductive decomposition $\mathfrak{k}=\mathfrak{h}\oplus \mathfrak{m}$  (cf. [1,Section7.1). For $\lambda \ne -1$  any of the following complements ${\mathfrak{m}}_{\lambda }$  of $\mathfrak{h}$  give rise to a reductive decomposition: ${\mathfrak{m}}_{\lambda }=\left\{\left(\begin{array}{cc}X& 0\\ 0& -\lambda {X}^{T}\end{array}\right);X\in \mathfrak{o}\left(n\right)\right\}.$  Thus for any sequence ${\lambda }_{i}$  converging to $-1$  with ${\lambda }_{i}\ne -1$  we get a sequence of (extrinsic) canonical connections ${\mathfrak{m}}_{{\lambda }_{i}},$  which does not converge to a connection at all. Notice that the normal part of the canonical connection given by ${\mathfrak{m}}_{1}$  coincides with the usual normal connection (see Section  6 ).

2 The definition is stated in Section  1 .

6 Examples

Orbits of $s$  -representations

An $s$  -representation is the isotropy representation of a semisimple symmetric space $S.$  Assumed that $S$  is irreducible, all non-vanishing orbits of the isotropy representation of $S$  are full submanifolds, i.e. they are not contained in a proper affine subspace, since in the case of symmetric spaces the isotropy representation and the holonomy representation coincide. If $S$  is of noncompact type, then each unit tangent vector $X$  of $S$  defines a point $X\left(\infty \right)$  in the spherical boundary at infinity $S\left(\infty \right)$  of $S,$  such that the unit sphere of a given tangent space can be identified with $S\left(\infty \right).$  The orbit of $X$  under the action of the isotropy representation at the foot point of $X$  coincides under the above identification with the orbit of $X\left(\infty \right)$  under the usual action of the isometry group of $S$  on $S\left(\infty \right).$  Thus the orbits of $s$  -representations (as submanifolds of the corresponding tangent space seen as ${\mathbb{R}}^{n}$  ) can be seen the standard imbeddings of real flag manifolds (also known as $R$  -spaces) into Euclidean space as considered by Kobayashi and Takeuchi [6. A detailed description of such orbits can be found in [1,p. 4652.
Let ${\nabla }^{\perp }$  be the usual normal connection on $\nu M.$  We say that $f\left(M\right)$  has extrinsically homogeneous normal holonomy bundle, if for any points $p$  and $q$  on $M$  and any curve $c$  on $M$  joining $p$  and $q,$  there exists an isometry $\overline{g}$  of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  mapping $f\left(p\right)$  to $f\left(q\right),$  leaving $f\left(M\right)$  invariant and such that the mapping ${\overline{g}}_{*}{|}_{{\nu }_{p}M}:{\nu }_{p}M⟶{\nu }_{q}M$  coincides with the ${\nabla }^{\perp }$  -parallel transport along $c.$  Olmos and Sánchez [9(see also [1,p. 164andp. 211) gave the following characterization of orbits of $s$  -representations:
Theorem 15 ([9). Let $M$  be a full closed submanifold of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}.$  Then the following assertions are equivalent:
• (1) $M$  admits a canonical connection $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }$  whose normal part coincides with the usual normal connection on $\mathcal{ℰ},$  i.e. ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{\perp }={\nabla }^{\perp }.$
• (2) $M$  is the orbit of an $s$  -representation;
• (3) $M$  has extrinsically homogeneous normal holonomy bundle.
In this case $\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\Gamma =0$  is equivalent to the following two conditions:
$\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\alpha =0$  and ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}\left(\nabla -{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{T}\right)=0,$  where $\nabla$  is the Riemannian connection on $M.$  This in mind, we restrict our attention to the tangent part of the canonical connection. In analogy to Proposition  13 we get:
Proposition 16. Let $M$  be a closed manifold of dimension $n$  and let $\Lambda ,d>0.$  Assume that there exist a sequence $\left({f}_{i}\right)$  of immersions of $M$  into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  and a sequence $\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}\right)$  of connections on $\mathcal{ℬ}=M×{\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  satisfying ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}^{\perp }={\nabla }_{i}^{\perp },$  where ${\nabla }_{i}^{\perp }$  is the usual normal connection on $\mathcal{ℰ}$  given by ${f}_{i}.$  If for each positive integer $i$  the triple $\left(M,{f}_{i},{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}\right)$  lies in $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,d,n,m,\frac{1}{i}\right),$  then $M$  can be immersed into an affine subspace of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  as orbit of an $s$  -representation.
• Proof. The proof of Proposition  13 can essentially be copied and we refer to this proof for the chosen notations. The only delicate point is that the limit immersion $f$  constructed in the proof of Proposition  13 is a priori only of class ${\mathcal{C}}^{1,\beta }$  and might not give rise to a normal connection ${\nabla }^{\perp }.$  But we show that in the case at hand $f$  is of class ${\mathcal{C}}^{2,\beta }.$  Let $Y$  and $Z$  be ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}^{T}$  -parallel tangent vector fields, then $\left({\partial }_{X}{\alpha }_{i}\right)\left(Y,Z\right)=\left({\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{X}{\alpha }_{i}\right)\left(Y,Z\right)-{\alpha }_{i}\left({{\Gamma }_{i}}_{X}Y,Z\right)-\alpha \left(Y,{{\Gamma }_{i}}_{X}Z\right)-{A}_{i}\left({\alpha }_{i}\left(Y,Z\right),X\right),$  where ${\alpha }_{i}$  and ${A}_{i}$  are the second fundamental form and the shape operator of ${f}_{i}$  and ${\Gamma }_{i}={\nabla }_{i}-{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}^{T}.$  Thus $||\partial {\alpha }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}\le ||{\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}_{i}{\alpha }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}+2||{\alpha }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}||{\Gamma }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}+{\left(||{\alpha }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{g}_{i}}\right)}^{2}.$  Again we can assume that $0\in {f}_{i}\left(M\right).$  Recall that the second fundamental form coincides with the Hessian of the immersion. Thus the ${\mathcal{C}}^{3}$  -norm of ${f}_{i}$  on $\left(M,{{g}_{M}}_{i}\right)$  is given by $||{f}_{i}|{|}_{{\mathcal{C}}^{3}\left(\left(M,{{g}_{M}}_{i}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)}=||{f}_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}+||d{f}_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}+||{\alpha }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}+||\partial {\alpha }_{i}|{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}\le 2+\frac{1}{i}\varepsilon +\Lambda +3{\Lambda }^{2}.$  The norms $||\cdot |{|}_{0}^{{{g}_{M}}_{i}}$  converge to $||\cdot |{|}_{0},$  the supremum norm corresponding ${g}_{M}.$  Hence the sequence $\left({f}_{i}\right)$  is bounded in ${\mathcal{C}}^{3}\left(\left(M,{g}_{M}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right)$  as well for big $i.$  By the embedding theorem for Hölder spaces (see Proposition  1 ) there exist a function $f\in {\mathcal{C}}^{2,\beta }\left(\left(M,{g}_{M}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right),0<\beta <1$  and a subsequence of $\left({f}_{i}\right)$  converging to $f$  in ${\mathcal{C}}^{2,\beta }\left(\left(M,{g}_{M}\right),{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\right).$  This shows that $f$  gives rise to a normal connection ${\nabla }^{\perp }.$  Moreover the proof of Proposition  13 now shows that $f\left(M\right)$  has extrinsically homogeneous normal holonomy bundle. Reduction of the codimension eventually yields the claim.
Using the same arguments as in the proof of Theorem  14 , we get as a consequence of the above proposition the following pinching result for orbits of $s$  -representations.
Theorem 17. There exists a constant $\varepsilon >0$  depending on $d,\Lambda ,n$  and $m$  with the following property:
If a triple $\left(M,f,\stackrel{~}{\nabla }\right)$  with ${\stackrel{~}{\nabla }}^{\perp }={\nabla }^{\perp }$  lies in $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,d,n,m,\varepsilon \right),$  then $M$  can be immersed into an affine subspace of ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  as an orbit of an $s$  -representation.

Extrinsically symmetric submanifolds

A submanifold of a Euclidean space is called extrinsically symmetric, if it is invariant under the reflections at each of their normal spaces.
Ferus [4has classified and characterized these submanifolds as follows:
• $\bullet$  The connected extrinsically symmetric submanifolds of Euclidean space are products of closed extrinsically symmetric submanifolds with totally geodesic ones.
• $\bullet$  The full closed extrinsically symmetric submanifolds of Euclidean space are exactly the symmetric orbits of $s$  -representations.
• $\bullet$  A closed submanifold of Euclidean space is extrinsically symmetric if and only if its second fundamental form is parallel, i.e. ${\nabla }^{\perp }\alpha =0.$
The pinching theorem for closed extrinsically symmetric submanifolds of Euclidean space resulting from this characterization can be be found in [11.
Theorem 18 ([11). There exists a constant $\varepsilon >0$  depending on $d,\Lambda ,n$  and $m$  with the following property:
If a triple $\left(M,f,\nabla \oplus {\nabla }^{\perp }\right)$  lies in $\mathcal{ℳ}im\left(\Lambda ,d,n,m,\varepsilon \right),$  then $M$  can be immersed into ${\mathbb{R}}^{m}$  as an extrinsically symmetric submanifold.
As the characterization of Ferus does not use a supplementary connection any more, this pinching result does not assume the existence of a supplementary $\varepsilon$  -almost canonical connection. Instead we assume that $\nabla \oplus {\nabla }^{\perp }$  is $\varepsilon$  -almost canonical, which only means that $||{\nabla }^{\perp }\alpha |{|}_{0}<\varepsilon .$  Moreover in this case we do not need to construct the extrinsic isometries by a limit process, as they are given by the reflections at the normal spaces. Notice also that the condition $||\Gamma |{|}_{0}<\Lambda$  is now redundant since $||\alpha |{|}_{0}<\Lambda .$  References

1. Berndt, J.; Console, S.; Olmos, C.: Submanifolds and holonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton 2003
2. Eberlein, P.: Geometry of nonpositively curved manifolds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1996
3. Eschenburg, J.-H.: Parallelity and extrinsic homogeneity. Math. Z. 229 (1998), 339 347
4. Ferus, D.: Symmetric submanifolds of Euclidean space. Math. Ann. 247 (1980), 81 93
5. Katsuda, A.: A pinching problem for locally homogeneous spaces. J. Math. Soc. Japan 14(1) (1989), 57 74
6. Kobayashi S.; Takeuchi, M.: Minimal imbeddings of R-spaces. J. Differ. Geom. 2 (1968), 203 215
7. Min-Oo, M.; Ruh, E. A.: Comparison theorems for compact symmetric spaces. Ann. scient. Éc. Norm. Sup., IV. Sér. 12 (1979), 335 353
8. Nomizu, K.: Invariant affine connections on homogeneous spaces. Am. J. Math. 76(1) (1954), 33 65
9. Olmos, C.; Sanchez, C.: A geometric characterization of the orbits of $s$  -representations. J. Reine Angew. Math. 420 (1991), 195 202
10. Olmos, C.: Isoparametric submanifolds and their homogeneous structures. J. Diff. Geom. 38 (1993), 225 234
11. Quast, P.: A pinching theorem for extrinsically symmetric submanifolds of Euclidean space. Manuscr. Math. 115 (2004), 427 436
12. Sakai, T.: Riemannian Geometry. American Mathematical Society, Providence 1996
13. Strubing, M.: Symmetric submanifolds of Riemannian manifolds. Math. Ann. 245 (1979), 37 44

Acknowledgments

I am most grateful to J.-H. Eschenburg and P. Ghanaat for many valuable discussions and helpful remarks. Moreover I wish to thank all my colleagues at the Universität Augsburg for their hospitality and E. A. Ruh for his support during the past years. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant PBFR-106367.
Departement de mathematiques, Universite de Fribourg, Switzerland E-mail address : peter.quast@unifr.ch Current address : Institut für Mathematik, Universität Augsburg, Deutschland E-mail address : peter.quast@math.uni-augsburg.de