Our goal is to show the following:
Theorem 2
There exists a polarized weight
$1$
Hodge on
$H$
, such that the multiplication on the left
$$H\to Hom(H,H)$$
is a morphism of weight
$2$
Hodge structures, where the weight
$2$
Hoge structure on the left is the initial one, and the weight
$2$
Hodge structure on the right is induced by the weight
$1$
Hodge structure on
$H$
.
Remark 3
The main defect of this construction is the fact that it is not unique, and does not satisfy the universal property of Proposition 3 .
Proof. Recall that we have the decomposition
$${H}_{\mathbb{R}}=(W\oplus \overline{W}{)}_{\mathbb{R}}\oplus {M}_{\mathbb{R}},$$
which is a orthogonal decomposition, an algebra decomposition, and is compatible with Hodge decomposition.
$M$
is a sum of factors
$$M={\oplus}_{\sigma \in {\Sigma}_{M}}{H}_{\sigma},$$
where
${H}_{\sigma}:=H{\otimes}_{\sigma \left({K}^{+}\right)}\mathbb{R}$
is a subalgebra of
${H}_{\mathbb{R}}$
. There is already a complex structure on the first term, given by the isomorphism of real vector spaces
$$Re:W\sim =(W\oplus \overline{W}{)}_{\mathbb{R}},$$
and we simply have to put a complex structure
${I}_{\sigma}$
on each component
${H}_{\sigma}$
for
$\sigma \in {\Sigma}_{M}$
.
Note that we want the left multiplication map
$$H\to Hom(H,H)$$
to be a morphism of Hodge structures. This implies that
$${H}_{\sigma}\to Hom({H}_{\sigma},{H}_{\sigma})$$
has to be a morphism of real Hodge structures. But, for
$\sigma \in {\Sigma}_{M}$
, we know that
${H}_{\sigma}$
is of type
$(1,1)$
. Thus multiplication on the left on
${H}_{\sigma}$
by any
$h\in {H}_{\sigma}$
has to be of type
$(1,1)$
, which means that it commutes with the complex structure operator
${I}_{\sigma}$
. But as our algebra has an unit, this implies in turn that
${I}_{\sigma}$
has to be the multiplication on the right by some element
${m}_{\sigma}\in {H}_{\sigma}$
, satisfying the condition that
${m}_{\sigma}^{2}=1$
.
Furthermore, we want that our weight
$1$
Hodge structure is polarized, with a polarization of the form
$${\omega}_{a}(x,y)=<x,ya>,$$
for some
$a\in H$
satisfying
$t\left(a\right)=a$
. (This was the form chosen for the polarization on the
$W$
term, and since the polarization must be rational, we do not have another choice here.) The first condition for
${\omega}_{a}$
to polarize the real Hodge structure on
${H}_{\sigma}$
is the fact that
${\omega}_{a}$
is of type
$(1,1)$
for the complex structure
${I}_{\sigma}$
. Equivalently, for any
$x,y\in {H}_{\sigma}$
,
$$<x,ya>=<{I}_{\sigma}\left(x\right),{I}_{\sigma}\left(y\right)a>=<x{m}_{\sigma},y{m}_{\sigma}a>=<x,y{m}_{\sigma}at\left({m}_{\sigma}\right)>.$$
This implies that
$$\begin{array}{ccc}{m}_{\sigma}at\left({m}_{\sigma}\right)=a.& & \end{array}$$ 
(3.7)

Let us now distinguish the cases where
$K={K}^{+}$
,
$K\ne {K}^{+}$
.
a)
Case
$K\ne {K}^{+}$
. In this case, we proved in Lemma 4 that
${K}_{\sigma}\sim =\mathbb{C}$
. Choosing such an isomorphism gives
${i}_{\sigma}\in {K}_{\sigma}$
, with
${i}_{\sigma}^{2}=1$
. Thus we have the operator of complex structure acting on
${H}_{\sigma}$
by multiplication by
${i}_{\sigma}$
.
As
${i}_{\sigma}$
is in the center of
${H}_{\sigma}$
, and satisfies
$t\left({i}_{\sigma}\right)={i}_{\sigma}$
, the relation ( 3.7 ) for
${m}_{\sigma}={i}_{\sigma}$
is certainly satisfied for all
$a$
.
It remains to see that with this operator of complex structure
${I}_{\sigma}$
, the corresponding real weight
$1$
Hodge structure on
${H}_{\sigma}$
is polarized by
${\omega}_{a}$
for an adequate
$a\in H$
satisfying
$t\left(a\right)=a$
. As we know already that
${\omega}_{a}$
is of type
$(1,1)$
for
${I}_{\sigma}$
, we have only to verify that
$${\omega}_{a}(x,{I}_{\sigma}x)>0,$$
for
$0\ne x\in {H}_{\sigma}$
. By definition, this is equal to
$$<x,x{i}_{\sigma}a>.$$
For
$a={i}_{\sigma}\in {H}_{\sigma}\subset {H}_{\mathbb{R}}$
, this is equal to
$<x,x>$
which is positive by the second HodgeRiemann bilinear relations, because
${H}_{\sigma}\subset {H}_{\mathbb{R}}^{1,1}$
.
Thus it follows that it remains positive for any
$a$
in a neighbourhood of
${i}_{\sigma}$
in
${H}_{\mathbb{R}}$
satisfying
$t\left(a\right)=a$
, and in particular for a rational such
$a\in H\subset {H}_{\mathbb{R}}$
.
b)
Case
$K={K}^{+}$
. Here the
$a$
will be a fixed rational element of
$H$
such that
${\omega}_{a}$
satisfies the positivity conditions on the
$W$
components (the existence of which was shown in the previous section), and on the components
${H}_{\sigma}$
of the previous type a). Note that the multiplication (on the right or on the left) by
$a$
on
$H$
is an isomorphism, because it is
$K$
linear and for any imbedding
$\tau :K\hookrightarrow \mathbb{R}$
such that
$\tau \notin {\Sigma}_{M}$
, it induces an automorphism of
${H}_{\tau}$
, because
${\omega}_{a}$
is nondegenerate on
${H}_{\tau}$
.
(The existence of imbeddings
$\tau \notin {\Sigma}_{M}$
follows from the fact that
$W\ne 0$
by assumption.) We consider the commutative
$K$
subalgebra of
$H$
generated by
$a$
:
$${K}_{a}:=K\left[a\right]\subset H.$$
This subalgebra is invariant under
$t$
, because
$t\left(a\right)=a$
. Next, the subalgebra
${K}_{a,\sigma}:={K}_{a}{\otimes}_{\sigma \left(K\right)}\mathbb{R}$
of
${H}_{\sigma}$
is contained in
${H}^{1,1}$
, and thus satisfies the property that the intersection form
$$<x,y>=<xt\left(y\right),1>$$
is negative definite on
${K}_{a,\sigma}$
.
This implies as in the proof of Proposition
4 that the
$t$
invariant part
${K}_{a,\sigma}^{+}$
of
${K}_{a,\sigma}$
is a sum of copies
${\mathbb{R}}_{\rho}$
of
$\mathbb{R}$
, and that the corresponding decomposition of
${K}_{a,\sigma}$
(given by the action of the idempotents of
${K}_{a,\sigma}^{+}$
) is a decomposition as a sum of copies
${\mathbb{C}}_{\rho}$
of
$\mathbb{C}$
, where
$t$
acts as complex conjugation on each
${\mathbb{C}}_{\rho}$
. Furthermore, as
$t\left(a\right)=a$
and multiplication by
$a$
is an isomorphism on
${K}_{a}$
, each
${a}_{\rho}$
can be written uniquely as
${\lambda}_{\rho}{i}_{\rho}$
, where
${\lambda}_{\rho}$
is a positive real number, and
${i}_{\rho}\in {\mathbb{C}}_{\rho}$
satisfies
${i}_{\rho}^{2}={1}_{\rho}$
.
Let us define
${m}_{\sigma}$
by
$${m}_{\sigma}={\sum}_{\rho}{i}_{\rho}.$$
We have
${m}_{\sigma}^{2}={\sum}_{\rho}{1}_{\rho}=1$
. Furthermore
$t\left({m}_{\sigma}\right)={m}_{\sigma}$
, as
$t\left({i}_{\rho}\right)={i}_{\rho}$
, for all
$\rho $
.
Finally, as
${m}_{\sigma}\in {K}_{a,\sigma}$
, one has
${m}_{\sigma}a=a{m}_{\sigma}$
, and combining these three facts, we conclude that ( 3.7 ) is satisfied.
Thus the multiplication on the right by
${m}_{\sigma}$
defines a complex structure
${I}_{\sigma}$
on
${H}_{\sigma}$
, which satisfies the property that
${\omega}_{a}$
is of type
$(1,1)$
for
${I}_{\sigma}$
. In order to conclude that we have a real weight one polarized Hodge structure on
${H}_{\sigma}$
, we have to check the positivity property
$${\omega}_{a}(x,{I}_{\sigma}(x\left)\right)>0,\forall 0\ne x\in {H}_{\sigma}.$$
But as the numbers
${\lambda}_{\rho}$
are positive, one has
$${a}_{\rho}={n}_{\rho}^{2}{m}_{\rho},$$
for some
${n}_{\rho}\in \mathbb{R}$
. Thus, letting
$$n:={\sum}_{\rho}{n}_{\rho},$$
we have
$${a}_{\sigma}={n}^{2}{m}_{\sigma},$$
with
$n\in {K}_{a,\sigma}$
,
$t\left(n\right)=n$
. But then we have
$${\omega}_{a}(x,{I}_{\sigma}(x\left)\right)=<x,{I}_{\sigma}\left(x\right)a>=<x,x{m}_{\sigma}a>$$
$$=<x,x{n}^{2}{m}_{\sigma}^{2}>=<nx,nx>,$$
where the last inequality holds because
${m}_{\sigma}^{2}=1$
and
$t\left(n\right)=n$
. As
$n$
is nondegenerate, the second Hodge bilinear relations show that
$<nx,nx>$
is negative for all
$0\ne x\in {H}_{\sigma}$
, which is what we wanted.
Remark 4
Assume that either
${\Sigma}_{M}$
is empty, or that the center
$K$
of
$H$
satisfies
$K\ne {K}^{+}$
. In the first case, we constructed the weight
$1$
Hodge structure by defining its
${H}^{1,0}$
part to be
${H}^{2,0}{H}_{\mathbb{C}}$
, which is a right ideal. Thus multiplication on the right by elements of
$H$
are morphisms of weight
$1$
Hodge structure.
In the second case, the same is true if we choose for complex structure operator on the
${H}_{\sigma},\sigma \in {H}_{\sigma}$
, the multiplication by
${i}_{\sigma}\in K{\otimes}_{\sigma \left({K}^{+}\right)}\mathbb{R}$
. Indeed, as
${i}_{\sigma}$
is central, this multiplication commutes with right multiplication with elements of
$H$
.
Thus, in both cases, as in the KugaSatake case, we can construct an abelian variety, which admits
$H$
as a subHodge structure of weight
$2$
, and also
${H}^{op}$
as a ring of endomorphisms.
References

A. Beauville. Le groupe de monodromie des familles universelles d'hypersurfaces et d'intersections complètes. Complex analysis and Algebraic Geometry, LN 1194, 195207; SpringerVerlag (1986).

P. Deligne. La conjecture de Weil pour les surfaces
$K3$
, Inventiones Math. 15, 206226 (1972).

M. Kuga, I. Satake. Abelian varieties attached to polarized
$K3$
surfaces, Math. Annalen 169, 239242 (1967).

B. Lawson, M.L. Michelsohn. Spin Geometry , Princeton University Press, Princeton, NewJersey (1989).

D. Morrison. The KugaSatake variety of an abelian surface, J. Algebra 92 (1985), 454476.

K. Paranjape. Abelian varieties associated with certain K3 surfaces, Compositio Math. 68 (1988) pp 1122.

B. van Geemen. An introduction to the Hodge conjecture for abelian varieties, in Algebraic Cycles and Hodge Theory, Torino 1993, Springer LNM 1594 (1994) 233252.

B. Van Geemen. KugaSatake varieties and the Hodge conjecture, in The Arithmetic and Geometry of Algebraic Cycles, Eds: B.B. Gordon et al. Kluwer (2000) 5182.

B. van Geemen. Half twists of Hodge structures of CMtype. J. Math. Soc. Japan 53 (2001) 813833.

C. Voisin. Remarks on zerocycles of selfproducts of varieties, in Moduli of vector bundles (Proceedings of the Taniguchi symposium on vector bundles), (Ed. Maruyama), Decker (1994) 265285.

C. Voisin. Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I, II, Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics 77, Cambridge Univ. Press (2003).