1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 15A99,16Y60.
<ph f="cmbx">Kapranov rank vs. tropical rank</ph>

K. H. Kim

F. W. Roush

Department of Mathematics, Alabama State University, Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0271, and Fellow, Korean Academy of Science and Technology E-mail address : khkim@alasu.edu Department of Mathematics, Alabama State University, Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0271 E-mail address : froush@alasu.edu

1 Introduction

The tropical semiring ( R { } , min ( a , b ) , a + b )   has many applications but is of special interest in relation to algebraic geometry in terms of valuations. Roughly speaking a tropical matrix can arise as the matrix of valuations of a matrix of polynomials or power series over a field. In the paper [4three natural notions of rank are introduced.
Definition 1.1. An n × n   tropical matrix M   is nonsingular if and only ifthe minimum value over permutations π   of i = 1 n m i π ( i )   is realized uniquely.
If a matrix of power series is singular, then the corresponding tropical matrix must be singular in this sense.
Definition 1.2. The tropical rank of a tropical matrix M   is the largest k   such that M   has a nonsingular k × k   submatrix.
The relationship of the tropical semiring to algebraic geometry starts with a field of power series K   , where the power series are allowed to have general real exponents in t   and the coefficients lie in a base field F   . The degree map gives a valuation of this ring. Let   be an ideal in K [ x 1 , . . . , x d ]   , corresponding to an algebraic variety.
This gives rise to a variety
V ( )   in K d   consisting of (nonzero) d   -tuples which when substituted for the x i   make all elements of the ideal   equal to 0   . That gives rise to a tropical variety T ( )   in Euclidean d   -space by taking its image under the degree mapping.
For purposes of defining rank the following definition is satisfactory, however
[11gives a more general concept using Grassmannians and hyperplane intersections.
Definition 1.3. A tropical linear space is a tropical variety T ( )   where   is generated by linear forms in the x i   . Its dimension is d   minus the number of minimal generators of   .
Definition 1.4. The Kapranov rank of a tropical matrix M   is the least dimension of a tropical linear space containing the rows of M   .
The Kapranov rank may differ from the tropical rank, but the tropical rank is a lower bound for it. The Kapranov rank is closer to the concept one would like to use in algebraic geometry but does not have such a simple tropical nature. Moreover it can vary according to the field.
Definition 1.5. The Barvinok rank of an n × n   tropical matrix M   is the least k   such that M   is the product of an n × k   tropical matrix and a k × n   tropical matrix.
The Barvinok rank is an upper bound for the Kapranov rank. It is the most natural concept of rank for Boolean matrices, where it also has names such as Boolean rank and Schein rank [7. The 2   -element Boolean algebra is the subsemiring of the tropical semiring consisting of zero and infinity. However if we look at any 2   elements of the tropical semiring, the additive semigroup is isomorphic to the 2   -element Boolean algebra, and some properties of matrices whose entries lie in this subset will be like those of Boolean matrices. For basic properties of Boolean matrices, see [7.
Determining Kapranov rank over a given field involves dealing with nonlinear systems of polynomial equations over that field. Here we will largely deal with the case of Kapranov rank of
( 0 , 1 )   -matrices. Develin, Santos, and Sturmfels proved the following.
Theorem 1.6. [4. The tropical rank of M   is at most r   if and only if M   lies in the variety T ( J )   where J   is the algebraic variety of matrices of the same size as M   over K   of rank r   , and T   denotes tropicalization.
That means that there must be some matrix of rank r   over the field whose image is M   . They deduce the corollary that the Kapranov rank is the smallest rank of any lifting over K   .

2 Kapranov rank of matrices related to projective planes

Proposition 1. The Kapranov rank over a infinite field F   of an n × n   ( 0 , 1 )   -matrix M   is the least k   such that there exist two families of k   -dimensional vectors v s , w s   over F   such that m i j = 0   if and only if the inner product v i w j T = 0   where T   denotes transpose.
More generally the Kapranov rank over a field
F   of an n × n   nonnegative matrix M   is the least k   such that there exist two families of vectors v s , w s   over the ring K   of power series over F   involving arbitrary nonnegative powers of an indeterminate t   , such that m i j   is precisely the order in t   of the inner product v i w j T = 0   and here T   denotes transpose.
This result extends to the case of any two-valued tropical matrix. It would be of some interest to know whether if M   is nonnegative integer-valued, then one can always work with power series having nonnegative integer exponents.
Instead of working with two families of vectors, it is equivalent to work with a collection of vectors and hyperplanes through the origin, with the condition that a vector lies in the hyperplane, if we choose the hyperplanes orthogonal to the respective vectors in one of the two sets. That represents some concept of incidence which is natural for projective planes.
The following result is also essentially in
[4.
Proposition 2. Suppose we have a geometry consisting of a finite collection of points and lines and their incidence (membership) matrix, and suppose there is at most one line through any two points and any two lines intersect in at most one point. The tropical rank of the incidence matrix of the geometry, taken as a tropical ( 0 , 1 )   -matrix, is at most 3.
This remains true if we replace the
1   entries by arbitrary positive real numbers.
For modules over the ring of power series, it will not only be true that a submodule of a finitely generated free module will be free, but that if we have any spanning set for the submodule, some subset of that spanning set will be a basis (spanning and independent over the quotient field). One way to see this is to look at the first coordinate, take a spanning set element of minimum order there, use it as a first basis element, and use it to clear out that coordinate entirely; the resulting module is the kernel of a nontrivial mapping the projection to that coordinate, and has lower rank over the quotient field, and one can repeat the process. This is useful in analyzing certain configurations.
Lemma 2.1. Let V   be the algebraic set (subset of an algebraic variety) of all inner products from 2 sequences of n   vectors in c   -space. Its tropical dimension does not exceed its ordinary dimension which is at most a constant times n   .
Theorem 2.2. Under the above hypothesis, there are tropical matrices of tropical rank 3 and arbitrarily high Kapranov rank. These are obtained by taking the incidence matrices of finite projective planes and inserting general positive real numbers for the 1 entries (incidences of points on lines).

3 Diophantine equations

Hypothesis. Diophantine equations over the rational numbers are not decidable by a general algorithm.
This problem is unknown and very deep; Davis, Putnam, and Robinsion, and Matijasevitch proved (Hilbert's Tenth Problem) that Diophantine equations over the integers are algorithmically undecidable. To relate this to Kapranov rank, we note by the above that representing any system of incidence of lines and points in a projective plane is a problem of deciding if Kapranov rank is at most
3   . Then we make use of Hall's method given in [5for coordinatizing projective planes and defining algebraic operations solely in terms of systems of intersections of points and lines.
The method of Hall to coordinatize a projective plane starts by choosing
4   points X , Y , O , I   no three collinear, where O   is assigned coordinates ( 0 , 0   ), I   is given coordinates ( 1 , 1 )   , O X   and O Y   are the x   and y   -axes, and X Y   is understood as the line at infinity. The points on O I   other than its intersection denoted (1) with X Y   are given coordinates ( b , b )   . All points P   of the plane not on X Y   are given their x   and y   coordinates by intersecting X P   (a horizontal line) and Y P   (a vertical line) with O I   . Addition is defined by setting y = x + b   if and only if ( x , y )   is a finite point on the line joining ( 1 )   with ( 0 , b )   . Multiplication is defined by setting y = x m   if and only if ( x , y )   is a finite point on the line joining O   and the infinite point ( m )   which is the intersection of the line joining ( 0 , 0 )   and ( 1 , m )   , with X Y   . These operations agree with standard operations of arithmetic for the standard projective plane over any field. We can take a projective transformation so that any given finite set of points and lines are finite in the since of being and not lying on X Y   .
For further information on Diophantine undecidability over the rational numbers, see
[8.
Theorem 3.1. Determining whether a two-valued tropical matrix has Kapranov rank 3 over an infinite field has precisely the computational complexity of solving a system of Diophantine equations over that field.
Under the above hypothesis, computing Kapranov rank over the rational numbers is algorithmically undecidable. Computing Kapranov rank of an
n × n   ( 0 , 1 )   -matrix over any infinite field is NP-hard; over an algebraically closed field it is PSPACE-easy.
This extends to the case in which the matrix consists of integers of at most polynomial size. For larger sizes we must solve equations in terms of power series which are zero over large ranges, and the result is less clear. If it is a question of extending linearly after a very few stages, then it can be done.
It has previously been proved that determining Barvinok rank
[3and tropical rank [9are in general NP-hard problems. It would also be interesting to know what the general form of a nonnegative matrix of small tropical rank is, when it is not given directly by the pattern of zeroes.
It would also be interesting to know whether the Kapranov ranks over the complex numbers of a sequence projective planes over finite fields represented as tropical
( 0 , 1 )   -matrices tends to infinity. If so then there can be no purely tropical definition of a lower bound on Kapranov rank by which Kapranov rank over every field can be bounded, for the Kapranov ranks over different fields will not be mutually bounded. However it appears that there will be a tropically computable lower bound which can deal with dimensionality phenomenon of Theorem 4 and in that sense improves on Kapranov rank.
This is related to the topic of realizable matroids. References

  1. R. Bieri and J.R.J. Groves, The geometry of the set of characters induced by valuations, J. reine und angewandte Mathematik 347(1984),168-195.
  2. J. Canny, Some algebraic and geometric computations in PSPACE, Proc. 20th Symp. Theory of Computing, Chicago(1988),ACM Press.
  3. E. C ̧ ela, R. Rudolf, and J. Woeginger, On the Barvinok rank of matrices, presentation at the 2nd Aussois Workshop on Combinatorial Optimization, February 1998.
  4. M. Develin, F. Santos, and B. Sturmfels, On the rank of a tropical matrix, arxiv:math.CO/0312114.
  5. Marshall Hall, Group Theory, Macmillan, New York, 1964.
  6. Philip Hall, On the representatives of subsets, J. London Math. Soc. 10(1935),26-30.
  7. K. H. Kim, Boolean Matrix Theory and Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982.
  8. K. H. Kim and F. W. Roush, Problems equivalent to rational Diophantine solvability, Proc. A.M.S 124-2 (1989),493-505.
  9. K. H. Kim and F. W. Roush, Factorization of polynomials in one variable over the tropical semiring, arxiv:math.CO/0501167
  10. D. Speyer and B. Sturmfels, The tropical Grassmannian, math.AG/0304218.
  11. D. Speyer and B. Sturmfels, Tropical mathematics, arxiv:math.CO/0408099.

Department of Mathematics, Alabama State University, Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0271, and Fellow, Korean Academy of Science and Technology E-mail address : khkim@alasu.edu Department of Mathematics, Alabama State University, Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0271 E-mail address : froush@alasu.edu